Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 26-03-22, 21:56
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Oh, thanks for the above, Merry. I will go back and read your posts now!
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 26-03-22, 22:03
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

I was going to say they needed a witness from the barge to say what they saw, then I got to the bit where the coroner said he would have liked to have such a witness.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 26-03-22, 22:10
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Found Thomas's burial on FreeREG - 13 Sep 1875 at Blyth, Nottinghamshire, age 37, abode Ranskill. Harriet's abode on her marriage to William Sewell is Ranskill.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 27-03-22, 07:31
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

The death reg, burial and drowning article are definitely all the same George Smith, however, the article says: "it will be seen by the list that only two are married", which would suggest this isn't the right Mr Smith. There are no other great fits in Worcester district and none in Wolverhampton district, so he may be difficult to trace (if he died at all before 1847!).

In any case, that article is interesting. I find it pretty hard to imagine how so many could have drowned if the circumstances were as described, even with the likelyhood most couldn't swim.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 27-03-22, 09:16
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Yes, very interesting.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 27-03-22, 10:20
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,650
Default

They were working men, no doubt with heavy boots, and probably carrying their tools. None would have been prepared for such a disaster. Even if they could swim, I doubt they could have easily removed bags or unlaced their boots.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.