#11
|
||||
|
||||
Initial response:
EDIT: I've removed this response from the ODNB as I've just noticed I'm not supposed to quote them. Positive reply though.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
The Thomas Cooks of the academic world!
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
...if they require any further information?????
OC |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Reply from the research editor:
EDIT: just read I'm not supposed to quote their reply anywhere, so just to say I have had a positive response! They still have to investigate further before changing anything though, which is fair enough.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Translated to mean:
Oh, you pest, you have now given me untold hours of work. Well done Merry. It really does go to show that no source is ever impeccable unless you have seen the original YOURSELF. Something which my old headmaster constantly stated but which I didn't understand at the time. OC |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Glad to hear they are going to look into it.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Good result. I've amended things on Wikipedia a few times when I can prove that I'm right.
|
|
|