Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-23, 13:54
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default Phyllis Crispwood

Phyllis Crispwood marries Edward Filby in 1804 at St Mary, East Bedfont, Middlesex. https://www.ancestry.co.uk/discovery...e77bc445fd935a

They baptise 3 children that are definitely theirs Ann 1812, Sarah 1817, and John 1819.There are three other possibles, Maria 1807 and Elizabeth 1809 where the parents are named as Edward and Jane. And Robert Bourne b 1805 to Edward and Phyllis Bourne. All the baptisms are at St Mary, Bedfont.

There are trees that have accepted all these baptisms and Phyllis has become Phyllis Jane.

Phyllis is buried in Bedfont in 1840 and given a dob of 1777

However, Phyllis doesn't seem to exist before her marriage. Nor does any one else by the name of Crispwood. I have tried various wildcards to no avail.

Can anyone have any better luck? I know how great you all are!!

I've just checked John Fi;by's marriage record and the witnesses are Robert and Elizabeth Filby so it would seem that the "odd" baptisms are probably children of Edward and Phyllis.
__________________
Sue

Last edited by Sue from Southend; 05-06-23 at 13:57.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-23, 13:58
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,308
Default

For starters here is the death registration:

FILBY, PHILLIS 63
GRO Reference: 1840 S Quarter in STAINES Volume 03 Page 233


No mention of Jane.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-23, 14:06
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,322
Default

Sarah Pearce is a witness at Phyllis's wedding which fits with a public tree which has Phyllis's parents as John Pearce and Mary Wood, with Sarah Pearce being her sister, but of course I don't know whether that tree is right or not.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-23, 14:09
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,322
Default

Well, o.k., there is a baptism of a Phillis Jane Pearce 15 Apr 1777 at St Mary Lambeth, parents John and Mary Ann:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/imageview...&pId=922391230

Would fit everything nicely apart from the surname Crispwood!
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-23, 14:18
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,308
Default

I looked for a first marriage but couldn't find one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-23, 14:30
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,322
Default

She is a spinster on the marriage to Edward, but of course there could be a mistake somewhere.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-23, 15:10
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

Thanks for looking, Elizabeth and Kite.

I've looked for marriage for Sarah Pearce in the hope that Phyllis was a witness but no joy.

I wonder if "Crispwood" was where she lived? As in a farm or hamlet. Off to ask Google...
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-23, 16:11
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689
Default

I wonder whether either Edward or Phyllis had a speech impediment, or if the vicar was deaf? As neither could write, the couple had no opportunity to correct the register, and Robert Bourne sounds like a misunderstanding.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:33.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.