Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-03-22, 09:58
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,302
Default

There's an Eliza Sayle in London in 1871:

https://www.ancestry.co.uk/discovery...=successSource

Here is Eliza with her grandparents in 1861:

https://www.findmypast.co.uk/transcr...1%2F0021538060

The Esther Radcliffe you found earlier, Kate, is the other Esther's mother. I did have her on that census.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-03-22, 10:01
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,302
Default

Esther Patty was a spinster when she married James Patty in 1853 (the certificate is online at Family Search).

It seems it was common knowledge who Eliza's father was.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-03-22, 10:09
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,302
Default

Here is Eliza's baptism:

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61...=16&cc=1784428


Over the past 24 hours I've managed to locate 5 Isle of Man wills on Family Search and download them, helped by this index:

http://www.iomfhs.im/resources/wills/Index_A-Z.html

It entails scrolling through pages and pages.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-03-22, 12:36
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,316
Default

Post #8 shows that Eliza was illegitimate, so couldn't it just be that she used her father's surname when she got married?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-03-22, 13:56
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,680
Default

/I don't wish to muddy the water any more, but Esther Radcliffe from the original post, aged 86 in 1881 is living with Henry Clarke and Eliza nee Sayle. She has Clarke crossed through as a surname, and despite being an aged widow, has "putative daughter" as her relationship with head of household. Might this suggest that Clara was not actually Henry's daughter?
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-03-22, 14:53
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
/I don't wish to muddy the water any more, but Esther Radcliffe from the original post, aged 86 in 1881 is living with Henry Clarke and Eliza nee Sayle. She has Clarke crossed through as a surname, and despite being an aged widow, has "putative daughter" as her relationship with head of household. Might this suggest that Clara was not actually Henry's daughter?
I think daughter has been crossed out and replaced with relative. I think the enumerator started to write her in as if she was another one of the children and then realised his mistake.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-03-22, 15:35
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,302
Default

I'm keeping an open mind about Eliza and the wider family.

When Eliza was living with her grandparents she went by the name of Sayle, probably for respectability's sake.

There was a lot of illegitimacy and multiple marriages on the Isle of Man!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:15.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.