Hannah Pinkard

[Merry]

The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married

If she was a baby at baptism.

I wouldn't rule her out completely until I had seen the baptism or at least a full transcript of it, but I do agree that at first glance it would appear she is the child of the couple who married the year before.

Years ago I ruled someone out for similar reasons, but had I seen the bap I would have discovered she was 15 at baptism! (It took me about ten years to rule her back in!)

[Merry]

Elizabeth bapt. 13.9.1801
Parents John and Elizabeth Pinkard
She could be a sibling or could have used the name Hannah instead of Elizabeth

It looks likely that Elizabeth was married in 1820 in Stoke Goldington.

[kiterunner]

Susannah could possibly be a mistranscription of Hannah?

[vita]

Originally Posted by kiterunner

Susannah could possibly be a mistranscription of Hannah?

Could be, Kite - though death in 1874 gives her age as 72 & Susannah was

bap 1798. Just don't think its her somehow.

Agree what you say re late baptisms Merry - I've got a few of those too.

[Merry]

I think that Susanna may have married Jesse Clare in 1824. On the 1851 census Susan Clare b 1799 in Goldington is with OH, Jesse, in Turvey, Bucks.

[vita]

Originally Posted by Merry

I think that Susanna may have married Jesse Clare in 1824. On the 1851 census Susan Clare b 1799 in Goldington is with OH, Jesse, in Turvey, Bucks.

Looks like it, Merry - thanks.