Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Members' Direct Ancestors > Take One 2xGreat-Grandparent

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-11-14, 10:42
vita vita is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,015
Default Hannah Pinkard

Name - "Official" name and what they were known as

Hannah Pinkard

Date and place of birth

1802 Stoke Goldington, Buckinghamshire

Names of parents

Not known

Date and place of baptism - if applicable

Not known

Details of each of his or her marriages - if any

Richard Adderson Pearson 1822 Piddington, Northamptonshire

Occupation(s) - if any

Lace maker

Addresses where they lived - and please list which censuses you have or

haven't found him/her on

1841

Not found

1851 6 West St. Islington

1861 10 Vittoria St. Islington

1871 10 Vittoria St. Islington

Date and place of burial/cremation

1874 Islington

Details of will/administration of their estate - if applicable

Not known

Memorial Inscription - if any

Not known
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-11-14, 11:56
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

This is the nearest Hannah I can find:


Name: Hannah Pinkard
Gender: Female
Baptism Date: 13 Nov 1808
Baptism Place: Stoke Goldington,Buckingham,England
Father: Samuel Pinkard
Mother: Sarah
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-11-14, 12:03
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

This marriage is in the next door parish:


Name: Samuel Pinkard
Gender: Male
Marriage Date: 12 Oct 1807
Marriage Place: Gayhurst,Buckingham,England
Spouse: Sarah Clark
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-11-14, 12:06
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

I would imagine the child bap in 1808 would be a baby of no more than a few months as it seems very likely she was the child of the couple married in 1807. Makes her rather young at marriage if it's the same Hannah - do you have a copy of the original marriage entry?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-11-14, 12:08
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

This is the 1841 census:
1841 census on ancestry
Hornsey back cottages, St Mary Islington East, Middlesex
Richard Pearson 40
Hannah Do 38
Richard Do 15
John Do 12
Jane Do 6
Mary Do 4
Willm Do 1
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-11-14, 12:16
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

Richard and Hannah's marriage is transcribed on FreeREG but doesn't say anything about Hannah's age on there. Witnesses were John Pinkard and Mary Ann Pearson.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-11-14, 12:27
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

FamilySearch has the burial of a Hannah Pinkard at Stoke Goldington 11 Sep 1826, but annoyingly enough it doesn't give her age and it doesn't seem to be on FMP or FreeREG, so no way to tell whether it could be the one who was baptised in 1808.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-11-14, 13:24
vita vita is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,015
Default

Thanks Merry & Kite - I don't think Samuel & Sarah are my Hannah's parents. Everything

I've seen records her b as 1802.I had a feeling this might prove a difficult one -

Stoke Goldington seems to have been full of Pinkards for the last few hundred years.

Pretty sure witness Mary Ann Pearson would have been Richard's sister, a couple of years

younger than him.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-11-14, 15:26
catfordcrooner's Avatar
catfordcrooner catfordcrooner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Bromley
Posts: 20
Default

John Pinkard was a witness at the marriage I believe
Have found these - all Stoke Goldington:
Ann bapt. 31.3.1796
Susannah bapt. 25.3.1798
Elizabeth bapt. 13.9.1801
Parents John and Elizabeth Pinkard
She could be a sibling or could have used the name Hannah instead of Elizabeth
The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-11-14, 15:31
vita vita is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catfordcrooner View Post
John Pinkard was a witness at the marriage I believe
Have found these - all Stoke Goldington:
Ann bapt. 31.3.1796
Susannah bapt. 25.3.1798
Elizabeth bapt. 13.9.1801
Parents John and Elizabeth Pinkard
She could be a sibling or could have used the name Hannah instead of Elizabeth
The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married
Thanks CC - agree re ruling out 1808 Hannah. Trouble is, the area seems to

have had more Pinkards than you could shake a stick at. Identifying the right

one looks to be quite challenge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.