#21
|
|||
|
|||
Babs, I'm not sure how you are meant to do it. If it helps I went into Members List. Clicked on my name. Clicked on Statistics. Clicked on Find all Threads started by (me). Then Iworked my way through what I wanted to keep and hadn't done so previously.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
I think research threads are permanent.
__________________
Marg |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I was amazed Marg at how much I had accummulated in less than 6 months. I now have to follow up on all the leads. I've been like a child let loose in a lolly shop.
The following was what I was quoting in order to answer Babs. My interpretation is that there are no plans to delete anything but the options are kept open. "Site Help 29/8/2010 Deletion of threads on the Research Board. From - Muggins in Sussex Are there any plans to delete some of the older threads on the Research Board ? ------------- Not at the moment, Muggins, we'll let you know if that changes. Gwynne" |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Been looking for this family again in 1841 to answer Kate re Sarahs age on my John thread and have found this family
Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 997; Book: 1; Civil Parish: Rowley Regis; County: Staffordshire; Enumeration District: 2; Folio: 41; Page: 26; Line: 10; GSU roll: 474625. Dont know how near Rowley Regis Staffs is to Worcester |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
The Mary in that family is too young, isn't she?
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
No I have my Mary down as about 1818 so only slightly young Kate, my Sarah is abt 1798 this one 1796 ????
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
There is a baptism on FamilySearch for Mary Haden 13 Apr 1823 Rowley Regis, parents John and Sarah. So I don't think that family is yours, sorry, Babs.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Oh dear back to the drawing board for me , thanks Kate for your input dear ;;much appreciated
|
Tags |
to3g14 |
|
|