#21
|
||||
|
||||
I haven' got the time to look at this properly now, but if someone else wats to.....!
Saw this: WARD, ANN mmn WARD GRO Reference: 1882 M Quarter in SALFORD Volume 08D Page 85 and thought this might be her (the granddaughter) https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...&usePUBJs=true note the grandfather is a joiner called John. Connected? And if yes, to the right people or to the wrong people? Must dash..... Oh and there were dozens and dozens of Ward/Ward GRO records when I forgot put Salford in the district box, so have the GRO changed the way they enter up illegitimate births? *
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This looks like the family in 1871 but no Martha: https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults Nor in 1881: https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults Also, the older children were born in Manchester too, so Martha doesn't seem to fit. Could John jr have become a joiner after 1881? (He is a general labourer on the 1881 census.) Quote:
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
With regard to the number of Ward/Ward births, I think it's just there are a massive number of Ward/Ward marriages! I know when I use FreeBMD to search Ward married Ward a high percentage will not have married each other, but even so - there are a lot!!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry i may of lost the though train somewhere. Are we discounting Henry Ward b Leeds 1839 d i think 1866 & Mary Glow 1829 as Martha's parents? They also had a son Rowland b 1855 which ties in with Martha's daughter having son called Rowland Davis. Though i think Henry's age might be out as he would only have been 15 when they married! Coincidentally a Samuel Dodd is witness on the marriage cert.
Or am i babbling & completely of track on what you lovely ladies are talking about? |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
We were just checking on whether the Henry Ward could be wrong, I think. Or if that John Ward, joiner, could be Jessie's paternal grandfather.
But yes, this does look to be Martha's family in 1861: https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults 3 Rdge Bldgs, Leeds Henry Ward Head Mar 22 Black Smith Yorkre Leeds Mary Do Wife Mar 32 Do Do Rowland Do Son 6 Do Do Martha Do Daur 5 mo Do Do.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, I was trying to get Martha to marry someone from the joiner's household! (preferably his son, as you suggested, Kate!)
I can't see a baptism for Ann.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
No entry for 72 Peter Street in the 1883 or 1886 Slater's Directory of Manchester and Salford.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
So a dead end on Jessie's birth, i wonder if it was registered!
At least i have some new details so will go back further on Martha's side. Not sure about william & that marriage is it or isn't it them???? |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
So you don't think the Salford birth is the right one? I suppose whether it is or not you may only establish that Martha was her mother!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
|
|