Yes, the transcriber was obviously looking at the line below for William, and an idle glance at Elizabeth might suggest her surname was Clement. What surprises me is that nobody has put in a correction. I was there at the formal launch of Surrey registers, which happened years ago.
The entry above is even more baffling. I think the surname is Kerell or a variant thereof, probably from Sussex, but I cannot find Daniel anywhere else
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
|