View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-09-12, 16:09
Langley Vale Sue's Avatar
Langley Vale Sue Langley Vale Sue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Langley Vale!
Posts: 826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merry View Post
This Mary Ball shows as unmarried in 1871 but in 1861 she is a widow with her dau Mrs Jane Patrick aged 47 and her son-in-law William Patrick who is only 29!

In 1851 she is unmarried again and has a son William Ball aged 27.

In 1841 she is with her son William 19 and an Ann Ball aged 50.

So, assuming the 1861 has the wrong marital status, I can see she is likely to be the daughter of Thomas and Elizabeth Ball, but I can't see why she would be the mother of Susannah Jones.
In 1841 Susanna is living with Thomas & Elizabeth Ball. Obviously no relationships in 1841, but maybe this is where the assumption came from.
__________________
"What you see depends on what you're looking for."

Sue at Langley Vale
Reply With Quote