See post #82 for the William with 'wife' Ann. I've now found them in 1851 (they are a couple - no relationshps on the 1841) still as a family in Balderstone, so he is eliminated.
The other William with the Woodcock family has been transcribed by Ancestry as Walkins, which is why I haven't listed him before. He is a collier, so that's better than the William from post #82.
__________________
 Merry
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|