Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!

Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! (http://genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/index.php)
-   DNA Questions (http://genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   Relationships (http://genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=27645)

Margaret in Burton 26-04-19 15:18

Relationships
 
Not really had chance to look at much today but how do Ancestry work out relationships?
A second cousin once removed who I made contact with via GR years ago is listed as a 4th cousin.

My first cousins son who is my first cousin once removed is listed as my 2nd cousin and to my daughters a 3rd cousin when he is actually their 2nd cousin.

Phoenix 26-04-19 15:42

You have 50% DNA from father and 50% from mother but (in theory at least) you could have 50% DNA from paternal grandfather and 0% from paternal grandmother.
Ancestry is only saying what the likely relationship is, not what it actually is.
Sib's child is more closely related to some people than I am - which doesn't seem fair! - and makes a mockery of relationships.

kiterunner 26-04-19 15:54

It's just an estimate of the relationship based on the amount of shared DNA, Marg.

Margaret in Burton 26-04-19 16:13

Thanks. I understand now

JBee 27-04-19 17:14

If you look at your thru lines you will see a more accurate relationship based on submitted trees.

On the ordinary dna part it says my son is a 2nd cousin to his half aunt but on thru lines its correct as a half aunt.

However that is on the presumption that the trees are correct.

Have found person who has made a connection to a Lord c1800 but I haven't found anything that even possibly confirms that - wishful thinking I think.

Margaret in Burton 27-04-19 17:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBee (Post 359098)
If you look at your thru lines you will see a more accurate relationship based on submitted trees.

On the ordinary dna part it says my son is a 2nd cousin to his half aunt but on thru lines its correct as a half aunt.

However that is on the presumption that the trees are correct.

Have found person who has made a connection to a Lord c1800 but I haven't found anything that even possibly confirms that - wishful thinking I think.

Not got thru lines yet, at least I hadn’t this morning. It’s early days for me

Phoenix 27-04-19 21:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBee (Post 359098)
If you look at your thru lines you will see a more accurate relationship based on submitted trees.

On the ordinary dna part it says my son is a 2nd cousin to his half aunt but on thru lines its correct as a half aunt.

However that is on the presumption that the trees are correct.

Have found person who has made a connection to a Lord c1800 but I haven't found anything that even possibly confirms that - wishful thinking I think.

I think that the "Lord" in someone else's tree is actually an errant ancestor of mine:o:d


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:00.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.