Ann unknown (wife of Lionel Sillet)
Name - "official" name and what they were known as
Ann Date and place of birth Names of parents Date and place of baptism - if applicable Details of each of his or her marriages - if any Lionel Sillett is the father on her children's baptisms in 1801 in Kelsale, Suffolk, England (IGI batch P012761) Occupation(s) - if any Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK) - and please list which censuses you have or haven't found him/her on (if s/he lived in census times!). Date, place and cause of death Date and place of burial. Details of will / administration of their estate - if applicable Memorial inscription - if any Her daughter is here:http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/f...zabeth+sillett |
Hmm, Pallot's Marriage Index has a Lionel Sillett marrying a Letitia Newman in 1793 and a Lionel Sillett marrying an Elizabeth Spalding in 1807, both at Kelsale. I wonder if it's the same Lionel, and Ann fits in between the two? It says Lionel is a widower on the marriage to Elizabeth.
|
The NBI has a burial at Kelsale of an Ann Sillett in 1803, aged 35. That fits Kate's theory.
|
Also at Kelsale
Letitia Sillett buried 1794 aged 36 Elizabeth Sillett buried 1838 aged 59 Lionel Sillett buried 1823 aged 52 |
ooo - that's good to know, Thanks ladies :)
Will investigate... |
Oh poop!!!
I can't get familysearch to let me browse the records. There's a Lettive Newman & Lionel Sillett marriage in Feb 1793 but it's in Norwich not Kelsale. Maybe the records on Pallot's show the banns that were read in Kelsale?? or maybe it's another couple? btw I'm sure I used to be able to see Pallot's on Ancestry - I can't now though :( Familysearch says they were both born in 1772 (21 at marriage) which doesn't fit with Letitia dying one year later in 1794 aged 36. Would familysearch have defaulted the age to 21 if it stated "of full age" ? |
That sounds like it might be a marriage licence rather than a parish register entry.
Most of the licences I have say aged 21 years & upwards so if it is a licence & is the same case that explains the born 1772. BTW I'm not a Janet i'm a John lol :d:d:d |
Quote:
So you think they've just transcribed "of full age" as 21, then? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.